To expose the Myths About Testosterone Replacement Therapy

These days, lots of individuals, this includes surprisingly virtually all practising doctors, continue to cling on to the old dogma that Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT) for more mature males is dangerous and results in an increased likelihood of prostate cancer. They do this despite the point that there is not a single shred of proof to support this folktale and thus there never was.

Where did the figment of the health-related imagination come from then you may well ask? Search the medical literature as you may, I promise you that you will not develop one single peer review paper which supports the notion that improving a male’s testosterone levels increases his chances for developing prostate cancer or perhaps any other cancers for that matter. They simply are not there. They’re not there because the scientific proof for them isn’t there.

Nonetheless, here’s where many doctors may still be mixed up. If a male builds up metastatic prostate cancer one of the first lines of therapy for him is going to be knocking out all the testosterone of his. Today this is ordinarily achieved quite easily with medicines as Finasteride. As soon as this particular patient’s testosterone levels are reduced to near zero amounts he is going to go in no less than a temporary remission from his prostate cancer. So, if suprisingly low levels of testosterone are temporarily curative of prostate cancer then certainly it follows that very high amounts are causative. Is that not only good sense?

No, sorry, that’s not simply good sense which most certainly is not scientific. This sort of woolly thinking — that if the shortage of something is curative after that a great deal of the same thing must be causative, is known as a corollary. Corollaries are often used in religious debate and mathematical theory. Corollaries have no place in science and certainly no place in medicine. They usually leads you astray & confuse you as clearly they certainly in this example.

Besides, this’s likewise worth noting. Prostate cancer is predominately a disease of older males with declining testosterone levels. It’s not at all an ailment of younger males with high levels of this sex hormone circulating in the blood of theirs. Exactly how next can you argue that testosterone replacement therapy may be beneficial to prostate cancer? Certainly if anything the opposite would be the case although I’m not going about trying to make that case in this case.

Let us then put the last nail in the coffin of this pishogue about testosterone causing cancer. A recently conducted research into the safety of best testosterone booster diet replacement therapy, carried out by M.R. M and Feneley. Carruthers at The Institute of Urology and Nephrology University College, London and you do not get much grander than that; realized thus:

The likelihood of prostate cancer in this group of males (1,500) taken care of with testosterone over many years was equivalent to which expected in the overall population.

While I am at it next, allow me to just dispel another healthcare myth, popular amongst doctors about TRT. Doctors continue to hang on to the fallacy which, in order to figure out which males should be considered for TRT, it is always to first of all get blood for hormonal level assay. This is no longer the truth. A recently available study conducted by Trinick, Carruthers, Wheeler et al realized as follows: